Decision Time: New flightpath animation shows expanded Heathrow overflying 70 times the population of Gatwick
Posted: 17 October 2016 | International Airport Review | 1 comment
New animations comparing the number of people overflown with a new runway have been published today – with Heathrow impacting 70 times the population at Gatwick…


- Areas never flown over before include parts of Kensington, Notting Hill, Hammersmith and Shepherd’s Bush
- Gatwick to cap the number most affected by noise and pay their council tax
- Heathrow expansion comes with up to £25 billion health cost, according to Airports Commission research, compared to £1.5 billion for Gatwick


New animations comparing the number of people overflown with a new runway have been published today – with Heathrow impacting 70 times the population at Gatwick.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrEbMWNEono
The animations show new flightpaths into each airport side-by-side using Googlearth, with Heathrow overflying 278,000 people compared to 3,800 at Gatwick.
Join us live: Shaping the Next Generation of Hold Baggage and Air Cargo Screening
Join us live for an insightful webinar on 11th December at 14:00 GMT, in collaboration with Smiths Detection, as we explore the strategic balance of operational efficiency, regulatory compliance, and sustainability in high-volume security environments.
This session offers a focused look into future-proofing your security strategy.
Key learning points
- Cost Reduction: Strategies to minimize bag travel time while simultaneously reducing operational costs.
- Regulatory Roadmap: Insights into the next wave of regulatory changes and their impact on future investment decisions.
- Sustainable Systems: Practical approaches to building sustainability into security systems and lowering the total cost of ownership (TCO).
- Scalable Solutions: Real-world examples of scalable systems supporting current airport growth and preparing for tomorrow.
Register now for expert insights, case studies, and actionable strategies on operational efficiency!
The animations have been published on the day Gatwick restated its pledge to both cap the number of people most affected by noise, and pay £1000 towards their council tax, should the airport win the green light to build a new runway.
The Airports Commission’s own research says that the noise impact of an expanded Heathrow will generate up to £25 billion in health costs over 60 years, and £1.5 billion for Gatwick.
The flightpath shown is one of several new flightpaths which would cross highly populated areas of London never flown over before including St. Johns Wood, Maida Vale, Kensington, Notting Hill, Hammersmith and Shepherd’s Bush, and famous landmarks such as Regents Park and Lords Cricket Ground.
Gatwick CEO, Stewart Wingate, said:
“The difference in noise impact between the two schemes is stark. We have to decide whether to ignore the views of a million Londoners whose health will be affected by constant noise, or expand Gatwick, the environmentally responsible option where we can cap the number most affected by noise.
“Gatwick’s new runway will deliver the same economic benefit faster and at half the cost, meaning we can finally reap the benefits of new capacity and demonstrate to the world that Britain is open for business.”
Stay Connected with International Airport Review — Subscribe for Free!
Get exclusive access to the latest airport and aviation industry insights from International Airport Review — tailored to your interests.
✅ Expert-Led Webinars – Gain insights from global aviation leaders
✅ Weekly News & Reports – Airport innovation, thought leadership, and industry trends
✅ Exclusive Industry Insights – Discover cutting-edge technologies shaping the future of air travel
✅ International Airport Summit – Join our flagship event to network with industry leaders and explore the latest advancements
Choose the updates that matter most to you.
Sign up now to stay informed, inspired, and connected — all for free!
Thank you for being part of our aviation community. Let’s keep shaping the future of airports together!

















Superficial analysis that belies the importance of this subject. The ‘analysis’ fails to take account of ambient noise levels, the significant and overriding impact of night noise and the related health impacts. It also fails to mention the lack of public transport infrastructure around Gatwick which, if addressed, in turn would generate considerable noise and other environmental impact. It also fails to take account the tens of thousands of homes that would need to be built in the area to support the workforce needed to operate the airport. An informed analysis is the minimum your readership expects.