Heathrow expansion promises to deliver economic benefits for local residents

Posted: 8 June 2016 | Katie Sadler, Digital Content Producer, International Airport Review | 4 comments

Heathrow Airport CEO, John Holland-Kaye has announced five new pledges promising to deliver economic benefits for local residents and being a better neighbour.

Heathrow expansion promises to deliver economic benefits for local residents

Heathrow Airport CEO, John Holland-Kaye has announced five new pledges promising to deliver economic benefits for local residents and being a better neighbour.

Heathrow expansion promises to deliver economic benefits for local residents

Addressing the 2016 Responsible Business Summit in London on 08 June, Heathrow Airport’s CEO, John Holland-Kaye, revealed five new pledges to the airport’s local residents promising to deliver economic benefits with expansion and being a better neighbour with or without expansion.

A better neighbour with or without Heathrow expansion

The pledges highlight the airport’s ambitions if allowed to expand. A government decision on airport expansion in the South East was expected over the summer, however according to a report in the Evening Standard, this may now be pushed back to September.

Heathrow’s five pledges

1.       Help our communities prosper by providing up to 40,000 jobs, training opportunities and careers to benefit local families with expansion.

Through the current work of the Heathrow Academy, which last year helped over 500 local unemployed people secure employment at the airport; and in the future, through our Skills Taskforce, we will address our local skills shortage, and ensure that we provide careers, not just jobs.
2.      Be a good neighbour meeting tough environmental and noise limits and air quality rules, enforced by new independent regulators.

By building on our record in finding new technologies to reduce the impact of our operations, like using steeper approaches, and banning the noisiest classification of aircraft, which has contributing to a 14% reduction in areas affected by noise (as measured using 55LDen) over the last 9 years. We will continue our investments in tools to reduce emissions in aircraft at the gates and while they are taxiing, and in electric vehicles and chargers. 
3.      Tackle local traffic congestion by investing in local transport projects that put Heathrow at the centre of a new integrated bus and rail transport system.

Expanding on the schemes we already fund, including 24 hour bus services recently established for communities west to the airport and hosting the largest single-site car sharing scheme in the world. 
4.      Work together with local businesses, helping them make best use of the national asset on their doorstep and investing in the local economy.

Learning from the success of our annual Heathrow Business Summits, which provide opportunities for local SMEs to meet with our Tier one suppliers, we will build regional procurement hubs to ensure the benefits of Heathrow expansion are felt locally. 
5.      Build a lasting legacy for future generations, in partnership with local schools, colleges and universities.

Expanding our current STEM skills programmes for local primary and secondary schools and ensuring these programmes also tackle issues around social mobility and diversity for local youth

“We are already taking steps to deliver these pledges and we are happy to be held to them”

Heathrow CEO, John Holland- Kaye, said:  “If we are all to benefit from a stronger UK economy, Heathrow expansion is the right choice. But to expand, we need our local people to trust us to deliver the promises we make. We are already taking steps to deliver these pledges and we are happy to be held to them. They point to a more ambitious vision for the airport – one which sees Heathrow as a better neighbour at the centre of thriving West London and Thames Valley.”

Last month, Heathrow cleared the way for the Government to support its expansion proposal by meeting and, in most cases, exceeding the conditions set out in the Airports Commission’s recommendations for Heathrow expansion.

Today’s announcement follows Gatwick’s letter to the Prime Minister outlining eight new pledges which it says will guarantee Britain a new runway by 2025 if given the go ahead.

Speaking to International Airport Review, a Gatwick spokesperson said:

“Heathrow cannot simply promise away the reality that they affect hundreds of thousands of Londoners with noise and the air quality in the area around the airport is already at illegal levels.

“Heathrow’s latest ‘promises’ follow eight pledges Gatwick sent to the Prime Minister, including a guarantee it would deliver the UK a new operational runway by 2025. This means ground could be broken at Gatwick before the next election and the runway officially opened before the election after that – creating a second world class airport for the UK.

“A deliverable runway means Gatwick can also pledge that Britain gets the economic boost it needs as early as possible.  We can also fully fund our expansion plans, unlike Heathrow which is likely to require around £5billion of taxpayers’ money.”

Have your say…


We’d like to put the facts to our readers – who would you choose?

[polldaddy poll=”9419028″]

Related topics

4 responses to “Heathrow expansion promises to deliver economic benefits for local residents”

  1. Zélie Armstrong says:

    I don’t believe a word of it. In this area we have been told consistently that flights have not changed and it was all down to our imagination that we were suffering low flying aircraft directly over our houses. Now it has been admitted that there have been changes which have affected thousands of Londoners. When will they understand we are full, there is no more space for expansion. We are not deprived of jobs here either. Pollution is appalling now and will not be improved by expansion and more planes. The roads are congested, which also adds to pollution and the misery of getting around if you live close to the airport, no thought is given to residents at all. Rail and bus links are over crowded now and won’t be improved.

  2. Keith Robinson says:

    The Government wants it both ways – every time! In the previous round of debates when both Airports were under BAA control, a moratorium was placed on a second runway at Gatwick until 2019! Gatwick accepted that and buckled down to work at keeping the UK economy competitive – with the busiest single runway in the world.
    Then, the Government decided that the two airports (three if Stansted is included) had to be fully competitive!
    Again, Gatwick was sold (under false pretences?) – fully expecting that in 2019 it would be given the opportunity to match Heathrow’s two runways.
    Now, if it rules for Heathrow, the Government could be party to a miscarriage of natural justice if it doesn’t allow Gatwick to fulfil its expectations and promises!!
    Stop dithering and make a decision in favour of Gatwick NOW!! Heathrow’s chance will come again -all too soon!!

  3. Chris Jack says:

    Given that a new airport in UK seems doomed, surely Heathrow has better transport infrastructure connections and consequently a larger catchment area within a reasonable travel time. Accessible from M3, M4 and M40 with wider M25 connectivity, Heathrow is surely more accessible than Gatwick via to M25/M23. Access to London Underground and Heathrow Express connectivity to Paddington and Hayes surely gives wider rail access for Heathrow also. Growth in airport capacity requires increases in passengers to support that growth and Gatwick’s catchment area has traditionally been in the Surrey, Sussex and Kent area. Is there enough demand in that area and is the regional transport infrastructure sufficient to support maximisation of a second Gatwick runway??

  4. Andy Schutz says:

    Mr.Holland-Kaye might think that there are all sorts of good reasons to build another runway-plus-terminal (i.e. airport) at Heathrow. Well, I might think there are good reasons to build a 10-storey hotel in Mr. Holland-Kaye’s back garden. I might come up with all sorts of compelling business and economic arguments supporting this idea. I might find various good reasons why he and his neighbours should support this scheme. I might even offer Mr. Holland-Kaye a job in the hotel. But Mr. Holland-Kaye would probably not agree with me. He would probably tell me to get stuffed, because it’s his garden and why should he lose the use of that amenity just so someone else can maximise their profits. And he would be a huge hypocrite if he said that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Send this to a friend